ई-रिक्शा चालक की हत्या का खुलासा, पत्नी के प्रेमी ने दी थी हत्या की सुपारी

 

ई-रिक्शा चालक की हत्या का खुलासा, पत्नी के प्रेमी ने दी थी हत्या की सुपारी

पहाड़वासी

देहरादून। ई-रिक्शा चालक की हत्या उसकी पत्नी व प्रेमी ने दो लाख की सुपारी देकर करायी थी। पुलिस ने पत्नी सहित पांच लोगों को गिरफ्तार कर लिया है। यहां इसकी जानकारी देते हुए वरिष्ठ पुलिस अधीक्षक दलीप कुंवर ने बताया कि 29 नवम्बर को गुच्चूपानी में ई-रिक्शा चालक का शव मिला था जिसके सिर पर वार कर हत्या की गयी थी। पुलिस ने हत्या का मुकदमा दर्ज कर जांच शुरू कर दी। एसएसपी ने बताया कि घटना के दौरान क्षेत्र में काम करने वाले पांच संदिग्ध मोबाइल नम्बरों की जांच की गयी तो एक नम्बर अरशद पुत्र इकबाल निवासी बागपत का था जिसकी लोकेशन निकाली गयी तो उसकी लोकेशन बल्लूपुर चौक की मिली।

जिसके बाद पुलिस टीम ने अरशद को गिरफ्तार कर लिया। जिसने पुलिस को बताया कि मृतक मोहसिन की पत्नी शीबा उर्फ सीमा के शाबिर अली से अवैध सम्बन्ध थे जिसमें मोहसिन बाधा बन रहा था। साबिर अली व शीबा के कहने पर रईस खान ने उनको मोहसिन को मारने के लिए दो लाख रूपये की सुपारी दी थी। जिसके बाद उसने अपने साथी शाहरूख व रवि को अपने साथ मिला लिया था। रईस ने उनको बीस हजार रूपये एडवांस दिये थे। घटना के दिन अरशद, रवि व शाहरूख मोहसिन का ई-रिक्शा से गुच्चूपानी आ गये तथा वहां पर उन्होंने शराब लेकर गुच्चूपानी पार्किग के पास शराब पीने लगे। जब अंधेरा हो गया और मोहसिन नशे मे हो गया तो रवि ने एक पत्थर उठाकर मोहसिन के सिर पर वार किया और उसके बाद उन्होंने भी उसके सिर पर पत्थरों से वार कर उसकी हत्या कर दी थी। वह आज रईस से बकाया रूपया लेने आये थे। अरशद की निशानदेही पर पुलिस ने रवि व शाहरूख को गिरफ्तार करने के पश्चात साबिर अली व शीबा को भी उनके घर से गिरफ्तार कर लिया गया। रईस खान पुलिस के हाथ नहीं आया। पुलिस ने सभी के खिलाफ मुकदमा दर्ज कर उनको न्यायालय में पेश किया जहां से उनको न्यायिक हिरासत में जेल भेज दिया गया।

314 thoughts on “ई-रिक्शा चालक की हत्या का खुलासा, पत्नी के प्रेमी ने दी थी हत्या की सुपारी

  1. Your passion for what you do is evident in every post It’s inspiring to see someone truly fulfilling their purpose and making a positive impact

  2. Your posts always make me feel like I’m not alone in my struggles and insecurities Thank you for sharing your own experiences and making me feel understood

  3. You have a way of making each of your readers feel seen and heard That’s a special quality that not all bloggers possess Thank you for creating a safe space for us

  4. From the insightful commentary to the captivating writing, every word of this post is top-notch. Kudos to the author for producing such fantastic content.

  5. From the insightful commentary to the captivating writing, every word of this post is top-notch. Kudos to the author for producing such fantastic content.

  6. I just wanted to take a moment to say how much I appreciate your blog posts. They’re always well-written, informative, and keep me coming back for more. Keep up the great work!

  7. From the insightful commentary to the captivating writing, every word of this post is top-notch. Kudos to the author for producing such fantastic content.

  8. It means the world to us to hear such positive feedback on our blog posts. We strive to create valuable content for our readers and it’s always encouraging to hear that it’s making an impact.

  9. Your passion for this topic shines through in your writing It’s clear that you put a lot of effort and thought into your posts Thank you for sharing your knowledge with us

  10. I appreciate the effort that goes into creating high-quality content, and this post was no exception. The insights and information were top-notch and made for a really engaging read. Keep up the great work!

  11. Every time I read one of your posts, I come away with something new and interesting to think about. Thanks for consistently putting out such great content!

  12. I want to express my appreciation for the writer of this blog post. It’s clear they put a lot of effort and thought into their work, and it shows. From the informative content to the engaging writing style, I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.

  13. From start to finish, this blog post had us hooked. The content was insightful, entertaining, and had us feeling grateful for all the amazing resources out there. Keep up the great work!

  14. Does this apply to non-English markets as well? We’re seeing conflicting signals in our EU campaigns compared to what you’ve described here. Would love to hear your thoughts on regional variance.

  15. Question: Have you tested this approach with expired domains? We’re running some experiments now and the results are… mixed. Your methodology seems safer.

  16. This is a solid breakdown. One thing I’d add is that the impact of these updates often lags by 2-3 weeks. We tracked this across multiple projects and found the recovery phase is where most people give up too early.

  17. I’m curious about the sample size for these conclusions. We saw a 15% deviation in our own datasets, but the overall trend aligns with your findings. Good work.

  18. For anyone reading this, pay attention to paragraph 4. That subtle distinction between “diversity” and “randomness” is what saves you during a Core Update.

  19. Great read. It reminds me of the strategy we deployed last quarter. The focus on foundational stability really pays off when the algorithm shifts. Thanks for compiling this.

  20. I bookmarked this for my team. The section on avoiding footprints is crucial. We recently audited a site that got hit exactly because they ignored that principle. Good catch.

  21. I bookmarked this for my team. The section on avoiding footprints is crucial. We recently audited a site that got hit exactly because they ignored that principle. Good catch.

  22. Spot on about the indexing delays. It’s not just about building the link anymore; it’s about the “stickiness” of the placement. We’ve been focusing heavily on that metric lately.

  23. Spot on about the indexing delays. It’s not just about building the link anymore; it’s about the “stickiness” of the placement. We’ve been focusing heavily on that metric lately.

  24. This aligns with the “Signal Noise” theory we’ve been developing. You need enough noise to mask the signal, but not so much that you lose authority. delicate balance.

  25. Actually, I have to disagree slightly with the second point. In our testing, we found that over-optimization was less of a factor than pure engagement metrics. It’s interesting to see how different niches react differently.

  26. I’m sharing this with our content team. We’ve been struggling to explain why “quality over quantity” isn’t just a cliché, and this illustrates it perfectly.

  27. This is the missing piece of the puzzle for us. We had the content and the technical SEO, but the off-page signal diversity was lacking. Thanks for the clarity.

  28. The shift towards “entity-based” indexing is real. Your strategy seems to leverage that by building entity associations rather than just keyword matches. Smart.

  29. This complements the “Entropy” theory perfectly. If you don’t introduce randomness, you’re just painting a target on your back. Glad to see others advocating for smarter engineering.

  30. This is a solid breakdown. One thing I’d add is that the impact of these updates often lags by 2-3 weeks. We tracked this across multiple projects and found the recovery phase is where most people give up too early.

  31. Have you considered the impact of mobile-first indexing on these placements? We’ve noticed that some “desktop-safe” strategies are flagging on mobile crawls.

  32. This is a solid breakdown. One thing I’d add is that the impact of these updates often lags by 2-3 weeks. We tracked this across multiple projects and found the recovery phase is where most people give up too early.

  33. This is a solid breakdown. One thing I’d add is that the impact of these updates often lags by 2-3 weeks. We tracked this across multiple projects and found the recovery phase is where most people give up too early.

  34. This aligns with the “Signal Noise” theory we’ve been developing. You need enough noise to mask the signal, but not so much that you lose authority. delicate balance.

  35. I’m skeptical about the timeline you proposed, but I’m willing to test it. If this holds up, it changes how we structure our entire outreach program.

  36. The shift towards “entity-based” indexing is real. Your strategy seems to leverage that by building entity associations rather than just keyword matches. Smart.

  37. The analogy of the “immune system” is perfect. You need to build resistance before the virus (update) hits. Too many people react instead of prepare.

  38. The depth here is impressive. Most guides just skim the surface of link velocity, but your point about “natural variance” hits the nail on the head. It’s exactly what we preach to our clients.

  39. I bookmarked this for my team. The section on avoiding footprints is crucial. We recently audited a site that got hit exactly because they ignored that principle. Good catch.

  40. I’m sharing this with our content team. We’ve been struggling to explain why “quality over quantity” isn’t just a cliché, and this illustrates it perfectly.

  41. Does this apply to non-English markets as well? We’re seeing conflicting signals in our EU campaigns compared to what you’ve described here. Would love to hear your thoughts on regional variance.

  42. The depth here is impressive. Most guides just skim the surface of link velocity, but your point about “natural variance” hits the nail on the head. It’s exactly what we preach to our clients.

  43. The depth here is impressive. Most guides just skim the surface of link velocity, but your point about “natural variance” hits the nail on the head. It’s exactly what we preach to our clients.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *